Group: Admins
Posts: 2303
Member No.: 160
Joined: 22-June 04
QUOTE
Maybe I should be learning Fasm not Nasm...
it depends on your conditions - you have to try and then decide. fasm has ports to different platforms and still developed - it is hard to refuse after try it
Group: Members
Posts: 8
Member No.: 762
Joined: 8-November 04
QUOTE (shoorick @ Oct 23 2007, 02:33 AM)
QUOTE
Maybe I should be learning Fasm not Nasm...
it depends on your conditions - you have to try and then decide. fasm has ports to different platforms and still developed - it is hard to refuse after try it
I think I didn't consider FASM as after installing SUSE/Kubuntu I was confronted more with NASM as a software install options, than Fasm. Fasm looks very interesting, and after reading the background of why the author chose to develop the assembler, they are the same feelings I have about MASM and concern with NASM. So maybe this is the right path to go.
Thanks shoorick.
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)